Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for nitrous oxide using experimental animal data - A systematic review protocol
SourceEnvironmental Research, 178, (2019), pp. 108711
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
SubjectRadboudumc 0: Other Research RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 6: Metabolic Disorders RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Radboudumc 6: Metabolic Disorders RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences
Nitrous oxide (N2O) is widely used as inhalation analgesic and anaesthetic in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Previous evaluations resulted in classification of N2O as a possible risk factor for adverse reproductive health outcomes based on evidence from animal data. Available human data were considered inadequate, partly due to the possibility that other risk factors, such as co-exposures to other inhalation anaesthetics may have contributed to the adverse outcomes. As no substantial new human evidence has emerged since previous evaluations, this protocol describes a planned systematic review of the evidence obtained from animal studies. The aim is to assess the available evidence on the effects of N2O on reproductive and developmental outcomes in animals to inform a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit (OEL) for N2O. Comprehensive search strategies were designed to retrieve animal studies addressing N2O exposure from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Screening of the studies retrieved will be performed by at least two independent reviewers, while discrepancies will be resolved by reaching consensus through repeated review and discussions. Articles will be included according to criteria specified in this protocol. Outcome data relevant for reproduction and development will be extracted and risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers using the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Primary reproductive and developmental outcomes of interest will be the number of resorptions, malformations, and birth weight. We will focus on dose-response studies that allow to derive an OEL with the benchmark dose (BMD) approach. Adverse outcomes occurring at doses that are equivalent to the exposures occurring in human occupational settings will be particularly relevant for dose-response modelling. The proposed review has not been performed before. We will follow the procedures specified in this protocol. We will adhere to guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), adapted for animal studies. Ethical approval will not be required, as the review will use existing data available in the public domain.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) tolog in with SURFconextto upload a file for processing by the repository team.