A populist paradise? Examining populists' Twitter adoption and use
Source
Information, Communication & Society, 22, 12, (2019), pp. 1681-1696ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Politicologie t/m 2019
SW OZ RSCR SOC
Journal title
Information, Communication & Society
Volume
vol. 22
Issue
iss. 12
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 1681
Page end
p. 1696
Subject
Institute for Management Research; Inequality, cohesion and modernization; Ongelijkheid, cohesie en moderniseringAbstract
While populists are claimed to be masters of Twitter, we know surprisingly little about how they use the medium (if at all). This study examines (1) populists' Twitter adoption and (2) also investigates whether they differ from other political actors in their posting, connecting, and engagement behaviour on Twitter. We use a series of regression analyses to examine populists' Twitter adoption and use in the Netherlands (2010-2016). We find that populists are less likely to adopt Twitter and suggest this is due to the party structure of populist parties: they are typically highly centralized and are wary of internal dissent. However, when populists do have an account, they do not post less (or more) tweets. They are less likely to have reciprocal interactions though and are more selective in who they befriend. However, these friends are more likely to get retweeted, suggesting that populists actively contribute to creating echo chambers.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246515]
- Electronic publications [134152]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30494]
- Nijmegen School of Management [18830]
- Open Access publications [107683]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.