Getting away with foul play? The importance of formal and informal oversight institutions for electoral integrity
Publication year
2017Publisher
{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA} : WILEY
Source
European Journal of Political Research, 56, 3, (2017), pp. 487-511ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Politicologie t/m 2019
Journal title
European Journal of Political Research
Volume
vol. 56
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 487
Page end
p. 511
Subject
NON-RU research; Onderzoek niet-RUAbstract
{Electoral integrity is increasingly being recognised as an important component of democracy, yet scholars still have limited understanding of the circumstances under which elections are most likely to be free, fair and genuine. This article posits that effective oversight institutions play a key role in scrutinising the electoral process and holding those with an interest in the electoral outcome to account. The main insight is that deficiencies in formal electoral management can be effectively compensated for via one or more other institutional checks: an active and independent judiciary; an active and independent media; and/or an active and independent civil society. Flawed elections are most likely to take place when all four checks on electoral conduct fail in key ways. These hypotheses are tested and supported on a cross-national time-series dataset of 1,047 national-level elections held in 156 electoral regimes between 1990 and 2012.}
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Non RU Publications [15288]
- Open Access publications [80287]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.