Fulltext present in this item

Thumbnail
Fulltext: 204116.pdf
Format: PDF
Description: publisher's version
Title: Roles of the amygdala and basal forebrain in defense: A Reply to Lucyk et al. and implications for defensive action
Author(s): Klumpers, F. ; Kroes, M.C.W.
Publication year: 2019
Source: Neuropsychology Review, vol. 29, iss. 2, (2019), pp. 186-189
Number of Pages: 4 p.
ISSN: 1040-7308
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09401-y
Publication type: Article / Letter to editor

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : https://hdl.handle.net/2066/204116   https://hdl.handle.net/2066/204116

Display more details
Subject: 230 Affective Neuroscience
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center
Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment
Radboudumc 13: Stress-related disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience
Organization: SW OZ BSI KLP
PI Group Affective Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal title:
Neuropsychology Review
Volume: vol. 29
Issue: iss. 2
Page start: p. 186
Page end: p. 189
Abstract:
The commentary by Luyck and colleagues on our paper provides many stimulating viewpoints and interpretations of our original study on dissociable responses in the amygdala and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in threat processing. Here, we reply to some of the points raised and while agreeing with most of the comments also provide some alternative viewpoints. We end by putting forward a research agenda for how to further investigate the roles of these regions in threat processing, with an emphasis on studying their roles in defensive action.
Languages used: English (eng)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

Statistics