The impact of margin reduction on outcome and toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with image-guided volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In recent decades, outcomes of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) have improved as a result of implementing several strategies, such as chemoradiation. However, these improvements were achieved at the cost of increased toxicity. One way to reduce radiation-related toxicity is by reducing the margins. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2016, 206 consecutive patients were treated with CTV-PTV margin of 5mm and subsequently 208 patients with 3mm margin. This study evaluates the impact of reducing clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin on outcome and toxicity. RESULTS: All patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with daily-image guidance using cone-beam CT (CBCT). Overall acute grade 3 toxicity was significantly lower in 3mm-group, compared to 5mm-group (53.8% vs. 65%, respectively, p=0.032). The same was true for acute grade 3 mucositis (30.8% vs. 42.2%, p=0.008) and for acute grade 3 dysphagia (feeding tube-dependence) (22.1% vs. 33.5%, p=0.026). The incidence of ongoing feeding tube-dependence after 3months of radiotherapy was 11.1% and 20.4%, respectively (p=0.012). The 2-year incidence of late grade >/=2 xerostomia was 15.8% and 19.4% (p=0.8). The 2-year loco-regional control rates of patients treated in 3mm and 5mm-groups were 79.9% and 79.2% (p=1.0). The figures for disease-free survival were 71.5% and 72.7 (p=0.6) and for overall survival were 75.2% and 75.1% (p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Reducing the CTV-PTV margin from 5 to 3mm combined with daily CBCT-guided VMAT reduced the severity, frequency, and duration of radiation-related toxicity without jeopardizing outcome.