Ward climate in a high-secure forensic psychiatric setting: Comparing two instruments
Publication year
2018Number of pages
9 p.
Source
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17, 3, (2018), pp. 247-255ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ DCC NRP
Psychiatry
Onderzoekcentrum voor Staat en Recht
SW OZ BSI KLP
Journal title
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Volume
vol. 17
Issue
iss. 3
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 247
Page end
p. 255
Subject
DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 3: Plasticity and Memory; Experimental Psychopathology and Treatment; Neuropsychology and rehabilitation psychology; Radboudumc 13: Stress-related disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience; Neuro- en revalidatiepsychologie; Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
The psychometric properties and associations between the Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES) and the Group Climate Instrument-revised (GCI-r) were examined. These self-report questionnaires assessing ward climate were filled out by 123 male patients, residing in 3 high-secure forensic psychiatric facilities. Good internal consistency was found for all subscales of both instruments. The original factor structure was confirmed for the EssenCES, but not for the GCI-r. Bivariate correlation analyses indicated that the instruments measure related concepts. The results of this study call for further development and validation and for finding common grounds in the definition and operationalization of ward climate.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246216]
- Electronic publications [133894]
- Faculty of Law [25695]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93266]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30432]
- Open Access publications [107414]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.