Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer review
SourceResearch Integrity and Peer Review, 3, 1, (2018), pp. 1, article 11
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Philosophy and Science Studies
Research Integrity and Peer Review
SubjectPhilosophy and Science Studies
Following publication of this article  it was brought to our attention that we omitted to provide credit for Table 1. While the content of the table and the systematization of blinding in review have been referenced in the text as coming from , the credit line for Table 1 should have been added as follows: “Reproduced with permission from  licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 License”. The original publication of this article has been corrected accordingly.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) tolog in with SURFconextto upload a file for processing by the repository team.