Comments on methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behaviour
Publication year
2018Number of pages
2 p.
Source
Appetite, 130, (2018), pp. 344-345ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Primary and Community Care
SW OZ BSI CW
Journal title
Appetite
Volume
vol. 130
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 344
Page end
p. 345
Subject
Communication and Media; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Primary and Community Care - Radboud University Medical Center; Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
In a recent research report (Robinson, Bevelander, Field, & Jones, 2018) we examined the methodological and reporting quality of laboratory-based studies of human eating behaviour. Overall, we found that both the methodological and reporting quality of studies was sub-optimal. Based on our findings, we also made recommendations about how to address these issues including the likely need for design and reporting guidelines for laboratory studies of eating behaviour. Hetherington and Rolls (2018), Buckland and Dalton (2018), Stubbs and Finlayson (2018), Best, Barsalou, and Papies (2018) and Meule (2018) expanded on our recommendations and added some of their own in response to our paper.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [248380]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [94201]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30735]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.