Comments on methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behaviour

There is no fulltext present in this item.

Title:	Comments on methodological and reporting quality in laboratory studies of human eating behaviour
Author(s):	Robinson, E.; Bevelander, K.E. ; Field, M.; Jones, A.
Publication year:	2018
Source:	Appetite, vol. 130, (2018), pp. 344-345
Number of Pages:	2 p.
ISSN:	0195-6663
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.001
Publication type:	Article / Letter to editor
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : https://hdl.handle.net/2066/197092
Display more details
Subject:	All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center Communication and Media Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences
Organization:	Primary and Community Care SW OZ BSI CW
Journal title:	Appetite
Volume:	vol. 130
Page start:	p. 344
Page end:	p. 345
Abstract:	In a recent research report (Robinson, Bevelander, Field, & Jones, 2018) we examined the methodological and reporting quality of laboratory-based studies of human eating behaviour. Overall, we found that both the methodological and reporting quality of studies was sub-optimal. Based on our findings, we also made recommendations about how to address these issues including the likely need for design and reporting guidelines for laboratory studies of eating behaviour. Hetherington and Rolls (2018), Buckland and Dalton (2018), Stubbs and Finlayson (2018), Best, Barsalou, and Papies (2018) and Meule (2018) expanded on our recommendations and added some of their own in response to our paper.
Languages used:	English (eng)