Abstract
Background: Over the past decades, multiple approaches to aspiration sclerotherapy of large symptomatic hepatic cysts have been investigated. However, comparative data are scarce. Objective: The objective of this article is to compare cyst reduction, symptomatic relief, and adverse events between ethanol sclerotherapy and polidocanol sclerotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included adults having a symptomatic hepatic cyst treated at a European tertiary referral center with ethanol sclerotherapy (Center 1) or polidocanol-sclerotherapy (Center 2). We compared cyst diameter reduction (%) and symptom improvement (yes/no) within 12 months' post-treatment between centers using multivariate regression analyses adjusted for confounding factors. Finally, we compared adverse events using Fisher's exact test. Results: We included 71 patients from Center 1 and 66 patients from Center 2 (median age 57 years; 126/137 (92%) female). Cyst reduction was comparable between Centers 1 and 2: 37.5% (IQR 15.7-61.0%) versus 44.2% (IQR 24.6-60.5%), respectively (p = 0.35). Correspondingly, symptomatic relief was comparable: 30/53 (56.6%) versus 43/66 (65.2%), respectively (p = 0.88). Center 1 reported significantly more (11 versus 3; p = 0.047) adverse events than Center 2. Conclusion: We found comparable cyst reduction and symptomatic relief rates between ethanol- and polidocanol sclerotherapy, while adverse events occurred more often in the ethanol group. Prospective studies focused on clinical response are needed to further explore differences between approaches.
