Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To answer the dilemma clinician's face when deciding between cochlear implant (CI) and auditory brainstem implant (ABI) treatment options in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND). STUDY DESIGN: Case study supplemented with literature review and meta-analysis. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENT(S): Child with CHARGE syndrome and congenital deafness. INTERVENTION(S): ABI as there was no benefit after bilateral cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Speech and language development, quality of life. RESULTS: In one ear the cochleovestibular nerve was present on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without preoperative ABR responses. In the contra lateral ear the nerve could not be identified, despite present ABR responses. Nevertheless, there was no positive outcome with CI. The patient had improved speech and language and quality of life with ABI. Of the 108 patients with CND and CI identified in the literature review, 25% attained open-set speech perception, 34% attained closed-set speech perception, and 41% detected sounds or less. The appearance of the cochlear nerve on MRI was a useful predictor of success, with cochlear nerve aplasia on MRI associated with a smaller chance of a positive outcome post cochlear implantation compared with patients with cochlear nerve hypoplasia. CONCLUSION: Although patients with (apparent) cochlear nerve aplasia are less likely to benefit from CI, CI before ABI is supported as some patients attain closed or open-set levels of speech perception after cochlear implantation.
