Diabetes Mellitus and Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies
Fulltext:
182731.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
1.670Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2017Source
Tissue Engineering. Part B: Reviews, 23, 5, (2017), pp. 471-479ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Dentistry
Health Evidence
Journal title
Tissue Engineering. Part B: Reviews
Volume
vol. 23
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. 471
Page end
p. 479
Subject
Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Dentistry - Radboud University Medical Center; Health Evidence - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
BACKGROUND: The regeneration of bone defects resulting from trauma, resection of tumors, infection, or congenital disease is a challenge, and bone grafts are utilized in a wide array of clinical settings to augment bone repair and regeneration. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease, which affects 8.3% of the world population, summing approximately 387 million individuals. The consequences of the disease, for example, hyperglycemia, have been associated to a reduced capacity to form bone and poor bone quality, influencing bone healing. Our aim was to systematically review the literature to the effect of diabetic condition on bone regeneration in animal models, when using bone substitute materials from different origins, and perform a meta-analysis to quantitatively study the effect of DM on bone regeneration. METHODS: An extensive search strategy was carried out through PubMed and EMBASE to identify the potential relevant studies published from database inception until July 1, 2015. Initially, the title and abstract of 1409 studies were screened, after which inclusion criteria sorted 29 studies for full-text evaluation. After using exclusion criteria, a final number of seven studies could be included in the review. RESULTS: The seven included studies that passed our inclusion/exclusion criteria were all type 1 diabetes, comprising a total of 189 animals and 14 intrastudy comparisons. These studies presented a consistent and reduced risk of bias and showed a significant average effect size of -6.87% of bone formation for diabetes type 1 versus healthy condition [95% confidence interval: -10.55 to -3.18; I(2) = 87.4%; p = 0.0003]. INTERPRETATION: These findings prove that DM type 1 negatively influences bone formation compared with a healthy condition, irrespective of the bone substitute material used.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246625]
- Electronic publications [134196]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93367]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.