Mindshaping the world can make mindreading tractable: Bridging the gap between philosophy and computational complexity analysis
London, UK : Cognitive Science Society
InGunzelmann, G.; Howes, A.; Tenbrink, T. (ed.), 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017): Proceedings, pp. 1418-1423
The 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017) (London, UK, 26-29 July 2017)
Article in monograph or in proceedings
Display more detailsDisplay less details
SW OZ DCC AI
SW OZ DCC CO
Gunzelmann, G.; Howes, A.; Tenbrink, T. (ed.), 39th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2017): Proceedings
SubjectAction, intention, and motor control; Cognitive artificial intelligence; DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 2: Perception, Action and Control; DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 4: Brain Networks and Neuronal Communication
It is often assumed that the socio-cultural context positively influences mindreading performances. Among the available theories, mindshaping is proposed to consist of cultural mechanisms that make the social domain homogeneous and, hence, easier to interpret. Proponents of the mindshaping hypothesis claim that homogeneity is responsible for the computational tractability of mindreading, which is otherwise intractable. In this paper, we examine this core claim of mindshaping and investigate how homogeneity influences mindreading tractability. By taking action understanding as a case-study for mindreading, we formally operationalize mindshaping homogeneity in different ways with the goal of bridging the gap between informal claims and formal (in)tractability results. The analysis shows that only specific combinations of homogeneity may lead to tractable mindreading, whilst others do not. Additionally, the analysis reveals the possibility of a yet undiscovered mindshaping mechanism.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) tolog in with SURFconextto upload a file for processing by the repository team.