Validation, comparison, and combination of algorithms for automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images: The LUNA16 challenge
Publication year
2017Author(s)
Number of pages
13 p.
Source
Medical Image Analysis, 42, (2017), pp. 1-13ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Imaging
Pathology
SW OZ BSI ON
SW OZ DCC AI
Journal title
Medical Image Analysis
Volume
vol. 42
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 1
Page end
p. 13
Subject
All institutes and research themes of the Radboud University Medical Center; Cognitive artificial intelligence; DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 4: Brain Networks and Neuronal Communication; Radboudumc 16: Vascular damage RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Social DevelopmentAbstract
Automatic detection of pulmonary nodules in thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans has been an active area of research for the last two decades. However, there have only been few studies that provide a comparative performance evaluation of different systems on a common database. We have therefore set up the LUNA16 challenge, an objective evaluation framework for automatic nodule detection algorithms using the largest publicly available reference database of chest CT scans, the LIDC-IDRI data set. In LUNA16, participants develop their algorithm and upload their predictions on 888 CT scans in one of the two tracks: 1) the complete nodule detection track where a complete CAD system should be developed, or 2) the false positive reduction track where a provided set of nodule candidates should be classified. This paper describes the setup of LUNA16 and presents the results of the challenge so far. Moreover, the impact of combining individual systems on the detection performance was also investigated. It was observed that the leading solutions employed convolutional networks and used the provided set of nodule candidates. The combination of these solutions achieved an excellent sensitivity of over 95% at fewer than 1.0 false positives per scan. This highlights the potential of combining algorithms to improve the detection performance. Our observer study with four expert readers has shown that the best system detects nodules that were missed by expert readers who originally annotated the LIDC-IDRI data. We released this set of additional nodules for further development of CAD systems.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234204]
- Electronic publications [117151]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89179]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29172]
- Open Access publications [84184]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.