Stimulant Treatment Trajectories Are Associated With Neural Reward Processing in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Publication year
2017Source
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 78, 7, (2017), pp. e790-e796ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cognitive Neuroscience
Human Genetics
Psychiatry
PI Group Memory & Emotion
Journal title
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Volume
vol. 78
Issue
iss. 7
Page start
p. e790
Page end
p. e796
Subject
Radboudumc 7: Neurodevelopmental disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience; Cognitive Neuroscience - Radboud University Medical Center; Human Genetics - Radboud University Medical Center; Psychiatry - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The past decades have seen a surge in stimulant prescriptions for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Stimulants acutely alleviate symptoms and cognitive deficits associated with ADHD by modulating striatal dopamine neurotransmission and induce therapeutic changes in brain activation patterns. Long-term functional changes after treatment are unknown, as long-term studies are scarce and have focused on brain structure. In this observational study (2009-2012), we investigated associations between lifetime stimulant treatment history and neural activity during reward processing. METHODS: Participants fulfilling DSM-5 criteria for ADHD (N = 269) were classified according to stimulant treatment trajectory. Of those, 124 performed a monetary incentive delay task during magnetic resonance imaging, all in their nonmedicated state (nEARLY&INTENSE = 51; nLATE&MODERATE = 49; nEARLY&MODERATE = 9; nNAIVE = 15; mean age = 17.4 years; range, 10-26 years). Whole-brain analyses were performed with additional focus on the striatum, concentrating on the 2 largest treatment groups. RESULTS: Compared to the late-and-moderate treatment group, the early-and-intense treatment group showed more activation in the supplementary motor area and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (SMA/dACC) during reward outcome (cluster size = 8,696 mm(3); PCLUSTER < .001). SMA/dACC activation of the control group fell in between the 2 treatment groups. Treatment history was not associated with striatal activation during reward processing. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are compatible with previous reports of acute increases of SMA/dACC activity in individuals with ADHD after stimulant administration. Higher SMA/dACC activity may indicate that patients with a history of intensive stimulant treatment, but currently off medication, recruit brain regions for cognitive control and/or decision-making upon being rewarded. No striatal or structural changes were found.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243399]
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging [3976]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92493]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.