Impact of right ventricular side branch occlusion during percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on right ventricular function
Fulltext:
177040.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
609.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2017Source
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 18, 6, (2017), pp. 405-410ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cardiology
Journal title
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Volume
vol. 18
Issue
iss. 6
Page start
p. 405
Page end
p. 410
Subject
Radboudumc 16: Vascular damage RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 16: Vascular damage RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Cardiology - Radboud University Medical CenterAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of right ventricular side branch (RVB) occlusion, during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the right coronary artery (RCA), on right ventricular (RV) function. BACKGROUND: Developments in PCI techniques have expanded PCI CTO feasibility. However, the utilization of dissection and reentry techniques and extensive stent implantation increases the risk of coronary side branch occlusion. METHODS: Fifty-four patients (80% male, 63+/-10years) evaluated with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) prior and three months after successful PCI CTO RCA (median: 99days, IQR: 92-105days) were included. Right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), end-systolic volume (RVESV), and ejection fraction (RVEF) were quantified on CMR images. Occurrence of RVB occlusion and/or RVB recruitment was assessed using procedural angiograms. RESULTS: RVB occlusion was observed in 12 patients (22%), while RVB recruitment occurred in seven patients (13%). Overall, RVEF was comparable between baseline and follow-up (53.8+/-5.8 vs. 53.9+/-5.8%, p=0.95). RVB occlusion was not associated with a significant change in RVEDV or RVEF (156.9+/-36.3 vs. 162.1+/-35.5mL, p=0.30 and 54.2+/-3.9 vs. 52.7+/-4.4%, p=0.19, respectively); however a trend was observed for an increase of RVESV (72.5+/-20.0 vs. 77.4+/-20.7mL, p=0.05) at follow-up. RVB recruitment did not result in a significant improvement of RVEF (55.4+/-4.6 vs. 56.1+/-5.3%, p=0.75). CONCLUSION: RVB occlusion was not associated with a significant decreased RVEF at follow-up, although the results suggested a limited increase of RVESV.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [242948]
- Electronic publications [129673]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92351]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.