Fulltext:
176983.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
701.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2017Source
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25, 7, (2017), pp. 2196-2204ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Orthopaedics
Journal title
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Volume
vol. 25
Issue
iss. 7
Page start
p. 2196
Page end
p. 2204
Subject
Radboudumc 10: Reconstructive and regenerative medicine RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
PURPOSE: The incidence of retear following rotator cuff repair remains a major concern, and the cause and timing of retear remain unclear. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the timing of retears following rotator cuff repair at multiple time intervals. The hypothesis was that the 'critical period' for retears extends beyond the first three post-operative months. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 206 shoulders that underwent arthroscopic double-row (without suture bridge) suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears. Patients were recalled to three follow-up visits at the following post-operative time intervals: 3, 6, and 12 months or longer. Ultrasonography was performed at each visit, and Constant score was collected during the last visit. RESULTS: A total of 176 shoulders attended all required follow-up visits with mean age 56.0 years. Ultrasonography revealed retears in 16 shoulders (9.1 %) at 3 months, in 6 shoulders (3.4 %) at 6 months, and in 5 others (2.8 %) at the last follow-up, while it confirmed intact rotator cuffs in 149 shoulders (84.7 %) at the last follow-up (median 35.5; range 12-61). The incidence of retears was significantly associated with tear size (p = 0.001) and tendon degeneration (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The 'critical period' for healing following rotator cuff repair, during which risks of retears are high, extends to the first 6 months. The risk of retear is greatest for massive 3-tendon tears, which may require longer periods of protection. The clinical relevance of this study is the identification of patients at risk of retear and the adjustment of their rehabilitation strategy and time for return to work. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [238441]
- Electronic publications [122537]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [90373]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.