Can lexical knowledge modulate prelexical representations over time?
Publication year
2001Publisher
Nijmegen : MPI Psycholinguistics
In
Smits, R.; Kingston, J.; Nearey, T.M. (ed.), Proceedings of SPRAAC (Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification), pp. 9-14Publication type
Article in monograph or in proceedings
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Editor(s)
Smits, R.
Kingston, J.
Nearey, T.M.
Zondervan, R.
Organization
SW OZ DCC CO
Book title
Smits, R.; Kingston, J.; Nearey, T.M. (ed.), Proceedings of SPRAAC (Workshop on Speech Recognition as Pattern Classification)
Page start
p. 9
Page end
p. 14
Subject
150 000 MR Techniques in Brain Function; Atypical development in communications and cognition; PsycholinguisticsAbstract
The results of a study on perceptual learning are reported. Dutch subjects made lexical decisions on a list of words and nonwords. Embedded in the list were either [f]- or [s]-final words in which the final fricative had been replaced by an ambiguous sound, midway between [f] and [s]. One group of listeners heard ambiguous [f]-final Dutch words like [kara?] (based on karaf, carafe) and unambiguous [s]-final words (e.g., karkas, carcase). A second group heard the reverse (e.g., ambiguous [karka?] and unambiguous karaf). After this training phase, listeners labelled ambiguous fricatives on an [f]-[s] continuum. The subjects who had heard [?] in [f]-final words categorised these fricatives as [f] reliably more often than those who had heard [?] in [s]-final words. These results suggest that speech recognition is dynamic: the system adjusts to the constraints of each particular listening situation. The lexicon can provide this adjustment process with a training signal.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243110]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29977]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.