Creativity: Intuitive processing outperforms deliberative processing in creative idea selection
Publication year
2017Number of pages
9 p.
Source
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, (2017), pp. 180-188ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ BSI SCP
SW OZ BSI CW
Journal title
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume
vol. 73
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 180
Page end
p. 188
Subject
Behaviour Change and Well-being; Communication and MediaAbstract
Creative ideas are highly valued, and various techniques have been designed to maximize the generation of creative ideas. However, for actual implementation of creative ideas, the most creative ideas must be recognized and selected from a pool of ideas. Although idea generation and idea selection are tightly linked in creativity theories, research on idea selection lags far behind research on idea generation. The current research investigates the role of processing mode in creative idea selection. In two experiments, participants were either instructed to intuitively or deliberatively select the most creative ideas from a pool of 18 ideas that systematically vary on creativity and its sub-dimensions originality and usefulness. Participants in the intuitive condition selected ideas that were more creative, more original, and equally useful than the ideas selected by participants in the deliberative condition. Moreover, whereas selection performance of participants in the deliberative condition was not better than chance level, participants in the intuitive condition selected ideas that were more creative, more original, and more useful than the average of all available ideas.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246764]
- Electronic publications [134222]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30508]
- Open Access publications [107750]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.