The effect of late-phase contrast enhancement on semi-automatic software measurements of CT attenuation and volume of part-solid nodules in lung adenocarcinomas
Publication year
2016Source
European Journal of Radiology, 85, 6, (2016), pp. 1174-80ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Medical Imaging
Journal title
European Journal of Radiology
Volume
vol. 85
Issue
iss. 6
Page start
p. 1174
Page end
p. 80
Subject
Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the differences in semi-automatic measurements of CT attenuation and volume of part-solid nodules (PSNs) between unenhanced and enhanced CT scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans including unenhanced and enhanced phases (slice thickness 0.625 and 1.25mm, respectively) for 53 adenocarcinomas presenting as PSNs in 50 patients were retrospectively evaluated. For each nodule, semi-automatic segmentation provided the diameter, mean attenuation, mass, and volume of a whole nodule and its solid component. Interscan variability and statistical significance of the differences in those measures according to the adenocarcinoma category were evaluated by one reader. RESULTS: All parameters except for the mean attenuation of the solid components, were significantly increased on enhanced CT (p<0.05). For the whole nodule, the mean relative differences were as follows: the longest diameter, 1.4% (limits of agreement, -6.2-9.1); volume, 2.4% (-26.7-31.4); mass, 7.0% (-11.3-25.2); mean attenuation, 2.7% (-5.6-11). For the nodule's solid component, those differences were as follow: the longest diameter, 6.9% (-34.4-48.2); volume, 17.9% (-77.8-113.7); mass, 18.8% (-77.8-115.4). The differences of measures between the unenhanced and enhanced CT were not significantly different between two groups of adenocarcinoma in situ/minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and invasive adenocarcinomas (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As most volumetric and attenuation measurements changed significantly after contrast enhancement, care should be taken in comparing unenhanced and enhanced CT in the evaluation of PSNs.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229302]
- Electronic publications [111731]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [87821]
- Open Access publications [80513]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.