
Fulltext:
170381.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
214.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 4, (2009), pp. 327-341ISSN
Annotation
05 november 2009
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Organisatie-ontwikkeling
Journal title
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
Volume
vol. 26
Issue
iss. 4
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 327
Page end
p. 341
Subject
NON-RU research; Onderzoek niet-RUAbstract
This article addresses the portfolio management practices and challenges of contemporary firms. Based on a review of the extant literature on project selection, termination and deletion decisions, we conducted an in-depth interview study with 19 key informants in 11 multinational firms. We identified three genres of portfolio management decision making: formalist-reactive, intuitive, and integrative. Each genre can be described by a unique set of portfolio management practices. For example, formalist-reactive firms rely on quantitative criteria while intuitive firms prefer qualitative criteria. In addition, each genre has to overcome a unique set of challenges. We discuss the three genres in detail and provide several implications for portfolio management decision making.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Non RU Publications [15556]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.