Why is it so difficult to integrate ethics in Health Technology Assessment (HTA)? The epistemological viewpoint
Publication year
2016Source
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 20, 20, (2016), pp. 4202-4208ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Health Evidence
Journal title
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
Volume
vol. 20
Issue
iss. 20
Page start
p. 4202
Page end
p. 4208
Subject
Radboudumc 13: Stress-related disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience; Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
Ethics has been identified as a key element in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) since its conception. However, ethical issues are still not frequently addressed explicitly in HTA. Several valuable reasons have been identified. The basis of the article is the claim that ethics is often not part of HTA for "epistemological reasons". Hence, the main aim of the contribution is to explore in more details and emphasize them by using the fact/value dichotomy. Our conclusion is that current HTA configuration is predominantly based on the comparison among objective and empirically testable "facts", whilst ethics is not empirically testable. In this sense, there is a sort of "epistemological gap", which can explain why it is so difficult to integrate ethics in HTA. We suggest that the epistemological differences among the various domains of HTA are addressed more explicitly.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246515]
- Electronic publications [134102]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [93308]
- Open Access publications [107633]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.