Abstract
Recent Dutch and non-Dutch studies have shown that the absence of endocervical cells (ecc-) in an adequate cervical smear does not present an increased risk for the presence or occurrence of cervical cancer or premalignant abnormalities in a later phase. Based on these findings, the Coordination Committee Cervical Cancer Screening of the Dutch Health Insurance Council had advised dropping the repeat advice for non-abnormal ecc- smears by January 1st 2002. The National Health Insurance Council has agreed to this advice. The following measures have been taken: (a) no repeat advice for ecc- smears; in the case of negative findings the woman waits until the next five-yearly invitation from the screening programme; (b) whether the portio cervicis was seen has to be stated on the national request form; (c) the reporting of an ecc- in the cytology report and periodical feedback to general practitioners remains unchanged; (d) in the case of a non-abnormal ecc- smear with an uninspected portio or doubts as to whether the transformation zone was adequately scraped, either the smear will have to be repeated or the patient will have to be referred to the gynaecologist.
