On the need to unify neuroscience and physics
Source
Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, 3, 12, (2016), pp. 271-273ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
![https://hdl.handle.net/2066/162618](/themes/Mirage2//images/copy.png)
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ DCC SMN
Journal title
Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation
Volume
vol. 3
Issue
iss. 12
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 271
Page end
p. 273
Subject
Biological psychology; DI-BCB_DCC_Theme 3: Plasticity and Memory; Biologische psychologieAbstract
Neuroscience is a relatively new research field that, so far, has resulted in important progress in understanding the physiology, biochemistry, pharmacology, and structure of the vertebrate brain. Because of this progress, spectacular technological developments, i.e. positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), diffusion tensor imaging, magneto-encephalography, electro-encephalography, etc., and new treatments based on them, such as high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS), deep brain stimulation, etc., have been of great use. However, despite those technical and clinical successes in neuroscience, in which the advances in physics have played a substantial role, one fundamental problem is still unsolved, namely, how to unify neuroscience and physics? As we will discuss in the present editorial, not only is this problem important from a purely fundamental, theoretical perspective, but it is also vital for the development of more optimal treatments in clinical neuroscience.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [248471]
- Electronic publications [135728]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [30737]
- Open Access publications [108998]
Upload full text
Use your RU or RadboudUMC credentials to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.