Why people co-produce within activation services: the necessity of motivation and trust – an investigation of selection biases in a municipal activation programme in the Netherlands

Fulltext:
160389.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
206.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2016Source
International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 1, (2016), pp. 69-87ISSN
Annotation
02 juni 2015
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Bestuurskunde t/m 2019
Journal title
International Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume
vol. 82
Issue
iss. 1
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 69
Page end
p. 87
Subject
Governance and Innovation in Social Services (GAINS)Abstract
Activation services that aim at re-employment of jobseekers often suffer from ‘creaming’, i.e. selecting those who have the best qualifications to re-enter the labour market. New ways of delivery, such as co-production, are supposed to be less subject to selection mechanisms. To analyse whether co-produced activation programmes suffer from selection biases, participants in a local innovative activation programme (n?=?60) were compared to non-participants (n?=?18). Participants are more motivated in general and showed higher levels of generalized, municipal and interpersonal trust. Moreover, high general motivation relates to high levels of trust and perceived control. This indicates that there is indeed a selection bias within co-produced activation programmes. Therefore, it remains uncertain whether co-production is more successful in dealing with creaming than common types of service delivery.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229037]
- Electronic publications [111444]
- Nijmegen School of Management [17954]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.