The Invisible Hand of the Editor. The Making of the Paris Review Interview
Source
Interférences Littéraires, 18, (2016), pp. 217-232ISSN
Related links
Annotation
02 juli 2016
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Engelse Taal en Cultuur
Journal title
Interférences Littéraires
Volume
vol. 18
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 217
Page end
p. 232
Subject
Europe and its Worlds after 1800; Studying Criticism And Reception Across BordersAbstract
Although frequently cited in literary biographies, the Paris Review interviews are not often placed in the context of the medium for which they were originally produced. This article highlights the editorial processes which preceded the publication of the interviews, as opposed to reading the end products as autonomous texts which border on (auto)biography. In The Paris Review’s case these processes could take up years and involved a range of mediators, including editors, interviewers and literary agents. Whether the involvement was extreme, as in the case of the Allen Ginsberg interview, or more subtle, as in the case of the Ralph Ellison interview, the Paris Review editors made a critical imprint on the interview series, which has so far remained invisible to readers of the journal.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [246216]
- Electronic publications [133894]
- Faculty of Arts [30004]
- Open Access publications [107414]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.