
Fulltext:
156946.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
390.0Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2016Author(s)
Source
Public Integrity, 18, 3, (2016), pp. 237-253ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Bestuurskunde t/m 2019
Journal title
Public Integrity
Volume
vol. 18
Issue
iss. 3
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 237
Page end
p. 253
Subject
Institute for Management ResearchAbstract
Privatization, output steering, and other measures that are often collectively referred to as New Public Management have been broadly commented on in recent years. Critiques of New Public Management lament a diminishing publicness and an erosion of the public/private distinction. On closer inspection, however, the meaning of these concepts in the critiques is often not clear, which leads to confusion and paradox. Most notably, it remains unclear what is at stake in the public/private distinction. In this article, it is argued that these issues can be clarified when it is acknowledged that there are, in fact, two underlying ideals: a liberal ideal and a republican one. An elaboration of these ideals, and of the relation between them, helps in gaining a better understanding of the problems the new modes of government entail and in formulating more promising alternatives.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229016]
- Electronic publications [111213]
- Nijmegen School of Management [17953]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.