Rituximab as induction therapy after renal transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety
Publication year
2015Source
American Journal of Transplantation, 15, 2, (2015), pp. 407-16ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Nephrology
Laboratory Medicine
Pathology
Paediatrics - OUD tm 2017
Journal title
American Journal of Transplantation
Volume
vol. 15
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 407
Page end
p. 16
Subject
Radboudumc 11: Renal disorders RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences; Radboudumc 11: Renal disorders RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences; Radboudumc 5: Inflammatory diseases RIMLS: Radboud Institute for Molecular Life SciencesAbstract
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of rituximab as induction therapy in renal transplant patients. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 280 adult renal transplant patients were randomized between a single dose of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) or placebo during transplant surgery. Patients were stratified according to panel-reactive antibody (PRA) value and rank number of transplantation. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. The primary endpoint was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) within 6 months after transplantation. The incidence of BPAR was comparable between rituximab-treated (23/138, 16.7%) and placebo-treated patients (30/142, 21.2%, p = 0.25). Immunologically high-risk patients (PRA >6% or re-transplant) not receiving rituximab had a significantly higher incidence of rejection (13/34, 38.2%) compared to other treatment groups (rituximab-treated immunologically high-risk patients, and rituximab- or placebo-treated immunologically low-risk (PRA </= 6% or first transplant) patients (17.9%, 16.4% and 15.7%, p = 0.004). Neutropenia (<1.5 x 10(9) /L) occurred more frequently in rituximab-treated patients (24.3% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001). After 24 months, the cumulative incidence of infections and malignancies was comparable. A single dose of rituximab as induction therapy did not reduce the overall incidence of BPAR, but might be beneficial in immunologically high-risk patients. Treatment with rituximab was safe.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227244]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86731]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.