Publication year
2002Source
Tissue Engineering, 8, 6, (2002), pp. 1029-1036ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Plastic Surgery
Radiology
Periodontology and Biomaterials
Journal title
Tissue Engineering
Volume
vol. 8
Issue
iss. 6
Page start
p. 1029
Page end
p. 1036
Subject
Biomedical Magnetic Resonance; Implantology and biomaterials; Biomedische Magnetische Resonantie; Implantologie en biomaterialenAbstract
In animal studies of tissue engineering of bone, histology remains the standard for assessing bone formation. As longitudinal studies with this method are feasible only at the cost of large numbers of animals, we looked for an alternative. Therefore, demineralized bone matrix (DBM) and inactivated demineralized bone matrix (iDBM) implants were subcutaneously implanted in a rat. At 1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks postimplantation soft X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were done to monitor bone formation in the implants. At 7 weeks, the animal was killed and the implants were retrieved for histology. Our results showed that in vivo MRI is well suited to assess bone formation larger than 0.5 mm in diameter and to monitor the complete three-dimensional shape of the newly formed bone noninvasively and longitudinally. The MRI results matched well with the histology results obtained at 7 weeks. In contrast, X-ray imaging appeared inappropriate to monitor the bone formation process in DBM.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243110]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92415]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.