Publication year
2000Source
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 5, (2000), pp. 467-481ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging
SW OZ DCC CO
Journal title
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Volume
vol. 29
Issue
iss. 5
Page start
p. 467
Page end
p. 481
Subject
PsycholinguisticsAbstract
Based on the results of an event-related brain potentials (ERP) experiment (van Berkum, Brown, & Hagoort. 1999a, b), we have recently argued that discourse-level referential context can be taken into account extremely rapidly by the parser. Moreover, our ERP results indicated that local grammatical gender information, although available within a few hundred milliseconds from word onset, is not always used quickly enough to prevent the parser from considering a discourse-supported, but agreement-violating, syntactic analysis. In a comment on our work, Brysbaert and Mitchell (2000) have raised concerns about the methodology of our ERP experiment and have challenged our interpretation of the results. In this reply, we argue that these concerns are unwarranted and, that, in contrast to our own interpretation, the alternative explanations provided by Brysbaert and Mitchell do not account for the full pattern of ERP results.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243085]
- Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging [3969]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29973]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.