
Fulltext:
140297.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
258.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Patterns of Prejudice, 49, 1-2, (2015), pp. 135-162ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OZ RSCR SOC
Politicologie t/m 2019
Journal title
Patterns of Prejudice
Volume
vol. 49
Issue
iss. 1-2
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 135
Page end
p. 162
Subject
Distributional Conflicts in a Globalizing World: Consequences for State-Market-Civil Society Arrangements; Inequality, cohesion and modernization; Ongelijkheid, cohesie en moderniseringAbstract
Why do more men than women vote for populist radical-right (PRR) parties? And do more men than women still vote for the PRR? Can attitudes regarding gender and gender equality explain these differences (if they exist)? These are the questions that Spierings and Zaslove explore in this article. They begin with an analysis of men's and women's voting patterns for PRR parties in seven countries, comparing these results with voting for mainstream (left-wing and right-wing) parties. They then examine the relationship between attitudes and votes for the populist radical right, focusing on economic redistribution, immigration, trust in the European Union, law and order, environmental protection, personal freedom and development, support for gender equality, and homosexuality. They conclude that more men than women do indeed support PRR parties, as many studies have previously demonstrated. However, the difference is often overemphasized in the literature, in part since it is examined in isolation and not compared with voting for (centre-right) mainstream parties. Moreover, the most important reasons that voters support PRR parties seem to be the same for men and for women; both vote for the populist radical right because of their opposition to immigration. In general, there are no consistent cross-country patterns regarding gender attitudes explaining differences between men and women. There are some recurring country-specific findings though. Most notably: first, among women, economic positions seem to matter less; and economically more left-wing (and those with anti-immigrant attitudes) women also vote for the PRR in Belgium, France, Norway and Switzerland; and, second, those who hold authoritarian or nativist views in combination with a strong belief that gays and lesbians should be able to ‘live their lives as they choose’ are disproportionately much more likely to vote for PRR parties in Sweden and Norway. Despite these findings, Spierings and Zaslove argue that the so-called ‘gender gap’ is often overemphasized. In other words, it appears that populist radical-right parties, with respect to sex and gender, are in many ways simply a more radical version of centre-right parties.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [233362]
- Electronic publications [116753]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [28942]
- Nijmegen School of Management [18072]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.