Abstract
We evaluated the effects of hybrid and model-based iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms from different vendors at multiple radiation dose levels on image quality of chest phantom scans.A chest phantom was scanned on state-of-the-art computed tomography scanners from 4 vendors at 4 dose levels (4.1 mGy, 3.0 mGy, 1.9 mGy, and 0.8 mGy). All data were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and reduced-dose data also with IR (iDose4, Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D, Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction, Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction, prototype Iterative Model Reconstruction, and Veo). Computed tomography numbers and noise were measured in the spine and lungs. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated and differences were analyzed with the Friedman test.For all vendors, radiation dose reduction with FBP resulted in significantly increased noise levels (≤148\%) as well as decreased SNR (≤57\%) and CNR (≤58\%) (P < 0.001). Conversely, IR resulted in decreased noise levels (≤48\%) as well as increased SNR (≤94\%) and CNR (≤94\%). The SNRs and CNRs of the model-based algorithms at 80\% reduced dose were similar to reference-dose FBP.Hybrid IR algorithms have the potential to reduce radiation dose with 27\% to 54\% and model-based IR algorithms with up to 80\%.
