
Fulltext:
138615.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
211.3Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
1998Source
Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11, 3, (1998), pp. 201-215ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Sociale Bedrijfskunde - t/m 2007
Chemical Endocrinology
Vakgr. Bedrijfswetenschappen
Journal title
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Volume
vol. 11
Issue
iss. 3
Page start
p. 201
Page end
p. 215
Subject
Creatieve ondernemingAbstract
Business process re‐engineering (BPR) is described as a management fashion. Management fashions are introduced on the market for management knowledge by fashion‐setters, who are often consultants. Characteristic for management fashions are multi‐interpretability and promises of performance improvements. The demand for and supply of management fashions is constituted in iterative cycles. By drawing on primary and secondary data, we show how Dutch consultants handle the management fashion BPR. They tend to be highly pragmatic in using this fashionable label. In close interaction with clients, elements of the original BPR concept are dropped and notions of other concepts are included in what are called “BPR‐projects”. The label “BPR” is used for commercial reasons, yet it is easily decoupled from the original concepts and coupled to notions of other concepts. The consequences of these findings for the current literature on management fashions are discussed.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234365]
- Electronic publications [117392]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89214]
- Nijmegen School of Management [18213]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.