Publication year
2014Source
Spine, 39, 26, (2014), pp. 2115-8ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Primary and Community Care
Health Evidence
Journal title
Spine
Volume
vol. 39
Issue
iss. 26
Page start
p. 2115
Page end
p. 8
Subject
Radboudumc 4: lnfectious Diseases and Global Health RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health SciencesAbstract
The clinical introduction of novel medical devices often occurs without evidence of good methodological quality and with relatively little oversight and regulation. As a consequence, the safety, efficacy, and long-term effects of devices are frequently insufficiently known upon device approval. Recent controversies surrounding the Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) breast implants, metal-on-metal hip implants, and interspinous implants underscore the need to reconsider how innovation in medical devices can adhere to sound ethical standards without inhibiting surgical research and development. In this article, the introduction of spinal implants is taken as an example to firstly discuss the scientific and ethical challenges of developing, testing, and introducing novel medical devices and to secondly identify avenues for improving the existing regulatory frameworks for such innovation. Two measures for improvement are most feasible in the short term: demanding prospective studies before device introduction and developing registries to monitor and evaluate new medical devices. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [226841]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86405]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.