
Fulltext:
135036.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
528.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
The British Journal for the History of Science, December, 1, (2014), pp. 1-23ISSN
Annotation
08 augustus 2014
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Economische theorie en economisch beleid
Journal title
The British Journal for the History of Science
Volume
vol. December
Issue
iss. 1
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 1
Page end
p. 23
Subject
Distributional Conflicts in a Globalizing World: Consequences for State-Market-Civil Society ArrangementsAbstract
This article documents the history of the Allais paradox, and shows that underneath the many discussions of the various protagonists lay different, irreconcilable epistemological positions. Savage, like his mentor von Neumann and similar to economist Friedman, worked from an epistemology of generalized characterizations. Allais, on the other hand, like economists Samuelson and Baumol, started from an epistemology of exact descriptions in which every axiom was an empirical claim that could be refuted directly by observations. As a result, the two sides failed to find a common ground. Only a few decades later was the now so-called Allais paradox rediscovered as an important precursor when a new behavioural economic subdiscipline started to adopt the epistemology of exact descriptions and its accompanying falsifications of rational choice theory.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234109]
- Electronic publications [116862]
- Nijmegen School of Management [18202]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.