Fulltext present in this item

Thumbnail
Fulltext: 131506.pdf
Format: PDF
Description: publisher's version
Title: Investigating variation in replicability: A "Many Labs" replication project
Author(s): Klein, R.A.; Ratliff, K.A.; Vianello, M.; Adams, R.B.; Bahnik, S.; Bernstein, M.J.; Hasselman, F. ; Woodzicka, J.A.; Nosek, B.A.
Publication year: 2014
Source: Social Psychology, vol. 45, iss. 3, (2014), pp. 142-152
Number of Pages: 11 p.
ISSN: 1864-9335
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
Publication type: Article / Letter to editor

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item : https://hdl.handle.net/2066/131506   https://hdl.handle.net/2066/131506

Display more details
Subject: Learning and Plasticity
Organization: SW OW PWO [owi]
Journal title:
Social Psychology
Volume: vol. 45
Issue: iss. 3
Page start: p. 142
Page end: p. 152
Abstract:
Although replication is a central tenet of science, direct replications are rare in psychology. This research tested variation in the replicability of 13 classic and contemporary effects across 36 independent samples totaling 6,344 participants. In the aggregate, 10 effects replicated consistently. One effect – imagined contact reducing prejudice – showed weak support for replicability. And two effects - flag priming influencing conservatism and currency priming influencing system justification - did not replicate. We compared whether the conditions such as lab versus online or US versus international sample predicted effect magnitudes. By and large they did not. The results of this small sample of effects suggest that replicability is more dependent on the effect itself than on the sample and setting used to investigate the effect.
Languages used: English (eng)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

Statistics