
Fulltext:
122650.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
139.6Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2013Source
Development in Practice, 23, 5-6, (2013), pp. 742-754ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
SW OW MAW [owi]
SW OZ RSCR CAOS
Journal title
Development in Practice
Volume
vol. 23
Issue
iss. 5-6
Page start
p. 742
Page end
p. 754
Subject
Anthropology and Development StudiesAbstract
The Netherlands have a rather large civil society. Interestingly, Dutch politicians and civil society organisations do not recognise this themselves, voicing frequent appeals for more civil society. This can be explained by the typical development of Dutch civil society through a system of pillarisation, based upon concepts of subsidiarity and sovereignty in one's own constituency, leading to a civil society that at the end has outsourced to the government important functions like financing, governing, and legitimising. Two cases (traditional and contemporary) are presented to show the consequences. Finally, lessons for other countries at civil society crossroads are drawn.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [234109]
- Electronic publications [116863]
- Faculty of Social Sciences [29125]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.