
Fulltext:
120152.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
146.5Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Source
Philosophical Psychology, 28, 1, (2015), pp. 94-113ISSN
Annotation
31 mei 2013
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Leerstoel Filosofie van cognitie en taal
Former Organization
Kernleerstoel Taal en Cognitie
Journal title
Philosophical Psychology
Volume
vol. 28
Issue
iss. 1
Languages used
English (eng)
Page start
p. 94
Page end
p. 113
Subject
Center for Cognition, Culture and Language (CCCL)Abstract
Despite the fact that there is considerable evidence against the causal efficacy of proximal (short-term) conscious intentions, many studies confirm our commonsensical belief in the efficacy of more distal (longer-term) conscious intentions. In this paper, I address two questions: (i) What, if any, is the difference between the role of consciousness in effective and in non-effective conscious intentions? (ii) How do effective conscious distal intentions interact with unconscious processes in producing actions, and how do non-effective proximal intentions fit into this process? I argue that answers to these questions point to a picture of distal conscious intending as a form of self-programming. The metaphor of “self-programming” will be elucidated by using a distinction between “structuring” and
“triggering” causes. Though the self-programming metaphor does not amount to a full theory of conscious intending, I argue that it may be a useful heuristic in developing such a theory. I also argue that the metaphor is phenomenologically plausible.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227248]
- Electronic publications [108577]
- Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies [10965]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.