TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jacobs, A.J.
PY  - 2010
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/2066/164763
AB  - The article discusses the position of planning as an academic discipline vis-à-vis the social sciences on the one hand and planning practice on the other. In conclusion, it states that academic planning is ‘de-differentiated’, meaning that it is intimately entangled with spatial planning as a policy field, missing the connection with major developments going on in the social sciences, most notably the poststructuralist reconceptualization of social reality. Because of this, academic planning often has trouble defending its position in academia, misses out on opportunities of working together with other disciplines in social science, and refrains from claiming its position as a critical surveyor of planning practice, for the sake of society as a whole.
TI  - Hoe planning als wetenschappelijke discipline de boot mist: analyse van een verdeeld vakgebied
EP  - 19
SN  - 1572-302X
IS  - iss. 3
SP  - 16
JF  - Topos
VL  - vol. 20
L1  - https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/164763/164763.pdf?sequence=1
ER  -