Reperfusion therapy for STEMI: is there still a role for thrombolysis in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Publication year
2013Source
The Lancet (London), 382, 9892, (2013), pp. 624-32ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cardiology
Journal title
The Lancet (London)
Volume
vol. 382
Issue
iss. 9892
Page start
p. 624
Page end
p. 32
Subject
NCEBP 14: Cardiovascular diseasesAbstract
In the past ten years, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has replaced thrombolysis as the revascularisation strategy for many patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, delivery of primary PCI within evidence-based timeframes is challenging, and health-care provision varies substantially worldwide. Consequently, even with the ideal circumstances of rapid initial diagnosis, long transfer delays to the catheter laboratory can occur. These delays are detrimental to outcomes for patients and can be exaggerated by variations in timing of patients' presentation and diagnosis. In this Series paper we summarise the value of immediate out-of-hospital thrombolysis for STEMI, and reconsider the potential therapeutic interface with a contemporary service for primary PCI. We review recent trial data, and explore opportunities for optimisation of STEMI outcomes with a pharmacoinvasive approach.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [244228]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92893]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.