Effectiveness of multidisciplinary care for Parkinson's disease: A randomized, controlled trial
until further notice
SourceMovement Disorders, 28, 5, (2013), pp. 605-611
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & HTA
SubjectDCN MP - Plasticity and memory; DCN MP - Plasticity and memory NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; DCN MP - Plasticity and memory NCEBP 4 - Quality of hospital and integrated care; NCEBP 11: Alzheimer Centre; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health care; NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health care
Multidisciplinary care is considered an optimal model to manage Parkinson's disease (PD), but supporting evidence is limited. We performed a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) to establish whether a multidisciplinary/specialist team offers better outcomes, compared to stand-alone care from a general neurologist. Patients with PD were randomly allocated to an intervention group (care from a movement disorders specialist, PD nurses, and social worker) or a control group (care from general neurologists). Both interventions lasted 8 months. Clinicians and researchers were blinded for group allocation. The primary outcome was the change in quality of life (Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire; PDQ-39) from baseline to 8 months. Other outcomes were the UPDRS, depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale; MADRS), psychosocial functioning (Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's disease-Psychosocial; SCOPA-PS), and caregiver strain (Caregiver Strain Index; CSI). Group differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values and presence of response fluctuations. A total of 122 patients were randomized and 100 completed the study (intervention, n = 51; control, n = 49). Compared to controls, the intervention group improved significantly on PDQ-39 (difference, 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5-6.2) and UPDRS motor scores (4.1; 95% CI: 0.8-7.3). UPDRS total score (5.6; 95% CI: 0.9-10.3), MADRS (3.7; 95% CI: 1.4-5.9), and SCOPA-PS (2.1; 95% CI: 0.5-3.7) also improved significantly. This RCT gives credence to a multidisciplinary/specialist team approach. We interpret these positive findings cautiously because of the limitations in study design. Further research is required to assess teams involving additional disciplines and to evaluate cost-effectiveness of integrated approaches. (c) 2012 Movement Disorder Society.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.