Design of COSMIC: a randomized, multi-centre controlled trial comparing conservative or early surgical management of incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability
Publication year
2013Source
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14, (2013), pp. 52ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Neurosurgery
Orthopaedics
Rehabilitation
Neurology
Health Evidence
Former Organization
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & HTA
Journal title
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume
vol. 14
Page start
p. 52
Subject
DCN NN - Brain networks and neuronal communication; NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue DCN PAC - Perception action and control; NCEBP 1: Molecular epidemiology ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detection; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detectionAbstract
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Incomplete cervical cord syndrome without spinal instability is a very devastating event for the patient and the family. It is estimated that up to 25% of all traumatic spinal cord lesions belong to this category. The treatment for this type of spinal cord lesion is still subject of discussion. From a biological point of view early surgery could prevent secondary damage due to ongoing compression of the already damaged spinal cord. Historically, however, conservative treatment was propagated with good clinical results. Proponents for early surgery as well those favoring conservative treatment are still in debate. The proposed trial will contribute to the discussion and hopefully also to a decrease in the variability of clinical practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the clinical outcome of early surgical strategy versus a conservative approach. The primary outcome is clinical outcome according to mJOA. This also measured by ASIA score, DASH score and SCIM III score. Other endpoints are duration of the stay at a high care department (medium care, intensive care), duration of the stay at the hospital, complication rate, mortality rate, sort of rehabilitation, and quality of life. A sample size of 36 patients per group was calculated to reach a power of 95%. The data will be analyzed as intention-to-treat at regular intervals, but the end evaluation will take place at two years post-injury. DISCUSSION: At the end of the study, clinical outcomes between treatments attitudes can be compared. Efficacy, but also efficiency can be determined. A goal of the study is to determine which treatment will result in the best quality of life for the patients. This study will certainly contribute to more uniformity of treatment offered to patients with a special sort of spinal cord injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Gov: NCT01367405.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [227693]
- Electronic publications [107311]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [86198]
- Open Access publications [76433]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.