Rational basis for the combination of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion for prostate cancer diagnosis
Fulltext:
117536pub.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
189.8Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2013Source
Prostate, 73, 2, (2013), pp. 113-20ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Urology
Journal title
Prostate
Volume
vol. 73
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 113
Page end
p. 20
Subject
ONCOL 3: Translational research; ONCOL 3: Translational research NCMLS 6: Genetics and epigenetic pathways of disease; ONCOL 5: Aetiology, screening and detectionAbstract
BACKGROUND: The prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion are promising prostate cancer (PCa) specific biomarkers. Our aim was to simultaneously quantify the expression levels of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG in a panel of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), normal prostate adjacent to PCa (NP) and PCa tissue samples, to provide a rational basis for the understanding of the false-positive and false-negative results of the urine assays. METHODS: The tissue samples were carefully histopathologically characterized to obtain homogeneous groups. The mRNA was isolated, transcribed into cDNA and the relative expressions of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG were measured using a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression levels of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG were compared between the different groups. RESULTS: We included 48 BPH, 32 NP, and 48 PCa. The PCA3 expression levels progressively increased from BPH to NP (3 times) and finally to PCa (30 times). There were one false-positive sample and seven false-negative samples. The TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion was found in 8.3% of the BPH, 15.6% of the NP, and 50% of the PCa samples. The use of TMPRSS2:ERG in the PCA3 negative cases allowed diagnosis of four of the seven false-negative samples and added one false-positive, but we had to define a cut-off value to avoid eight false-positive results. CONCLUSIONS: Considering tissue expression of the markers, most of the false-negative results of the PCA3 test were corrected by TMPRSS2:ERG (57%) and the combination of both had a higher sensitivity for PCa diagnosis. Some of the control samples did express TMPRSS2:ERG and a cut-off value had to be defined to avoid false-positive results.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [244084]
- Electronic publications [131085]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92872]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.