Publication year
2012Source
Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9, 10, (2012), pp. 2671-81ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Cognitive Neuroscience
Journal title
Journal of Sexual Medicine
Volume
vol. 9
Issue
iss. 10
Page start
p. 2671
Page end
p. 81
Subject
DCN PAC - Perception action and control NCEBP 9 - Mental healthAbstract
INTRODUCTION: There is little work on the etiology of female sexual dysfunction (FSD), a highly contentious and heterogeneous disorder from classification and clinical perspectives. Clarifying causative mechanisms may enhance current psychiatric nosology. AIM: To elucidate the structure of genetic and environmental risk factors underlying the major subtypes of FSD. METHODS: Self-report questionnaires and multivariate twin model fitting on a population-based adult twin register (TwinsUK, London) including 1,489 female twins aged 18 to 85, comprising 244 MZ pairs, 189 DZ pairs, and 623 women whose co-twins did not participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the Female Sexual Function Index-Lifelong and its six dimensions (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) were subject to univariate and multivariate variance component analysis. RESULTS: The best-fitting multivariate model was an ACE Cholesky model, in which both additive genetic effects and non-shared environmental effects loaded on four FSD dimensions. There was significant genetic sharing between desire, arousal, lubrication and orgasm, but there was also significant genetic sharing between arousal, lubrication and orgasm independent of desire. These genetic loadings were small to modest effects (7% to 33%). Bivariate heritabilities suggested that a third of the covariance between these dimensions was genetic. Desire shared the least amount of genetic association with lubrication and orgasm. Non-shared environmental effects (which were stronger than genetic effects) were somewhat more dimension-specific. CONCLUSIONS: FSD is not etiologically homogeneous. There are at least two genetic factors to FSD symptomatology, and a tendency for more dimension-specific non-shared environmental factors as a more important indicative of unique factors involved in specific types of sexual problems reported by women. These results emphasize genetic factors as possible organizing principles for an etiologically based classification approach of FSD.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243984]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92811]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.