What could predict effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin to treat drooling: a search for evidence of discriminatory factors on the level of body functions or structures.

Fulltext:
110206.pdf
Embargo:
until further notice
Size:
228.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Publisher’s version
Publication year
2012Source
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, 16, 2, (2012), pp. 126-31ISSN
Annotation
01 maart 2012
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Neurology
Rehabilitation
Otorhinolaryngology
Paediatrics - OUD tm 2017
Journal title
European Journal of Paediatric Neurology
Volume
vol. 16
Issue
iss. 2
Page start
p. 126
Page end
p. 31
Subject
DCN MP - Plasticity and memory; DCN PAC - Perception action and control; NCEBP 10: Human Movement & Fatigue; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; ONCOL 3: Translational researchAbstract
BACKGROUND: The treatment of drooling is important to families that experience the daily impact and research to elucidate clinical factors that play a role in the outcome of drooling treatment should be encouraged. AIM: To define clinical factors that influence therapy outcome of submandibular Botulinum Toxin (BoNT-A) injections for drooling. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of 128 children with cerebral palsy were evaluated; 80 spastic and 48 dyskinetic movement disorder, mostly Gross Motor Function Classification System III and higher; over 70% had an IQ <70. In addition, 23 fully ambulant children with exclusively intellectual disability were treated for drooling by ultrasound-guided injections of BoNT-A into the submandibular glands. Salivary flow rates and drooling quotients were measured at baseline and at 8 weeks after injection. Extensive information about the oral motor performance was gathered. Successful clinical response was defined as a 50% reduction of the baseline Drooling Quotient; 85 children were responsive to BoNT-A and 66 children unresponsive. RESULTS: Five nominated clinical factors that possibly could influence saliva reduction (head position, lip seal, voluntary control over the tongue, control of voluntary movement functions, and mental age) did not influence the responsiveness to BoNT-A. INTERPRETATION: Other variables need to be considered to predict the outcome of BoNT-A treatment. This article describes the first attempt to reveal the contribution of body functions and structures to the outcome of BoNT-A submandibular injections.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [232036]
- Electronic publications [115291]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [89029]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.