Publication year
2012Source
British Journal of General Practice, 62, 597, (2012), pp. e268-74ISSN
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Primary and Community Care
Journal title
British Journal of General Practice
Volume
vol. 62
Issue
iss. 597
Page start
p. e268
Page end
p. 74
Subject
NCEBP 7: Effective primary care and public healthAbstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the considerable impact of migraine, the use of preventive medication in primary care is limited. Only about 5% of migraine patients who qualify for prophylaxis actually receive it, and adherence is far from optimal. AIM: To explore the opinions of GPs regarding preventive medication for migraine. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative focus group study in Dutch general practice. METHOD: Four focus groups (six GPs each) were formed. GPs were purposively sampled to acquire a range of participants, reflecting the more general GP population. RESULTS: GPs perceived patients' concerns about the impact of migraine and the potential benefits of prophylaxis. However, some were hesitant to start prescribing prophylaxis due to doubts about effectiveness, potential side effects, and the risk of developing drug dependency. GPs' decisions were often based on considerations other than those presented in national guidelines, for example, the patient's need to control their own problem. Many GPs placed responsibility for initiating prophylaxis with the patient. CONCLUSION: Various considerations hamper GPs from managing migraine with preventive medication, and various patient-related concerns cause GPs to deviate from national headache guidelines.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [243984]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [92811]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.