Open reduction versus endoscopically controlled reconstruction of orbital floor fractures: a retrospective analysis.
SourceInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 4, (2012), pp. 489-93
01 april 2012
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Paediatrics - OUD tm 2017
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
SubjectDCN MP - Plasticity and memory
The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative results of open reduction versus endoscopically controlled reconstructions of orbital floor fractures. The medical records of 83 patients, treated between January 2000 and December 2008, were reviewed for enophthalmos, diplopia and complications. Fifty-eight patients were operated on using open reduction and in 25 patients the open reduction was endoscopically controlled. A significantly better outcome, regarding enophthalmos and diplopia improvement, was found in the endoscopically controlled group. Endoscopically controlled reconstruction of orbital floor fractures seems to be a more accurate and successful treatment.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications 
- Faculty of Medical Sciences 
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.