Open reduction versus endoscopically controlled reconstruction of orbital floor fractures: a retrospective analysis.
Publication year
2012Source
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 41, 4, (2012), pp. 489-93ISSN
Annotation
01 april 2012
Publication type
Article / Letter to editor

Display more detailsDisplay less details
Organization
Paediatrics - OUD tm 2017
Neurology
Journal title
International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume
vol. 41
Issue
iss. 4
Page start
p. 489
Page end
p. 93
Subject
DCN MP - Plasticity and memoryAbstract
The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative results of open reduction versus endoscopically controlled reconstructions of orbital floor fractures. The medical records of 83 patients, treated between January 2000 and December 2008, were reviewed for enophthalmos, diplopia and complications. Fifty-eight patients were operated on using open reduction and in 25 patients the open reduction was endoscopically controlled. A significantly better outcome, regarding enophthalmos and diplopia improvement, was found in the endoscopically controlled group. Endoscopically controlled reconstruction of orbital floor fractures seems to be a more accurate and successful treatment.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications [229037]
- Faculty of Medical Sciences [87745]
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.