Impact of moderate vs stringent TSH suppression on survival in advanced differentiated thyroid carcinoma.
SourceClinical Endocrinology, 76, 4, (2012), pp. 586-592
1 april 2012
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
SubjectNCEBP 14: Cardiovascular diseases
OBJECTIVES: To assess (i) the influence of Thyrotropin (TSH) suppression at a level of <0.1 mU/l and (ii) whether FT3 and FT4 levels have a prognostic significance independently of TSH values with regard to survival in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) and distant metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective patient chart study, we reviewed survival in 157 DTC patients with distant metastases treated between September 1985 and 1 July 2010. Patients with at least three available FT3 and FT4 values during TSH suppression were eligible. RESULTS: Fifty-three of 157 patients died from DTC. DTC-specific survival was significantly better in patients with a median TSH level </=0.1 mU/l (median survival 15.8 years) than those with a non-suppressed TSH level (median survival 7.1 years; P < 0.001). However, there was no further improvement in survival caused by TSH suppression to a level </= 0.03 mU/l (P = 0.24). FT3 and FT4 levels were also significantly associated with poorer survival; of these, only the prognostic value of FT3 was independent from that of TSH levels. CONCLUSION: The care of patients with DTC and distant metastases is like walking an endocrinological tightrope: non-suppressed TSH levels, that is, >0.1 mU/l, are associated with an impaired prognosis. There is, however, no prognostic benefit from suppressing TSH to levels lower than 0.1 mU/l. On the contrary, an improvement in prognosis might be achieved by keeping FT3 levels as low as possible.
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.