SourceStatistics in Medicine, 31, 20, (2012), pp. 2169-78
Article / Letter to editor
Display more detailsDisplay less details
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & HTA
Statistics in Medicine
SubjectNCEBP 11: Alzheimer Centre; NCEBP 2: Evaluation of complex medical interventions; NCEBP 4: Quality of hospital and integrated care; NCEBP 6: Quality of nursing and allied health care
For cluster randomized trials with a continuous outcome, the sample size is often calculated as if an analysis of the outcomes at the end of the treatment period (follow-up scores) would be performed. However, often a baseline measurement of the outcome is available or feasible to obtain. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using both the baseline and follow-up score of the outcome will then have more power. We calculate the efficiency of an ANCOVA analysis using the baseline scores compared with an analysis on follow-up scores only. The sample size for such an ANCOVA analysis is a factor r(2) smaller, where r is the correlation of the cluster means between baseline and follow-up. This correlation can be expressed in clinically interpretable parameters: the correlation between baseline and follow-up of subjects (subject autocorrelation) and that of clusters (cluster autocorrelation). Because of this, subject matter knowledge can be used to provide (range of) plausible values for these correlations, when estimates from previous studies are lacking. Depending on how large the subject and cluster autocorrelations are, analysis of covariance can substantially reduce the number of clusters needed. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
- Academic publications 
- Faculty of Medical Sciences 
Upload full text
Use your RU credentials (u/z-number and password) to log in with SURFconext to upload a file for processing by the repository team.