Editor(s):
|
Goel, A.K.; Seifert, C.M.; Freksa, C.
|
Subject:
|
Language & Communication Multimodal language and communication Psycholinguistics |
Organization:
|
Toegepaste Taalwetenschap Internationale Bedrijfscommunicatie Communicatie- en informatiewetenschappen SW OZ DCC PL |
Book title:
|
Goel, A.K.; Seifert, C.M.; Freksa, C. (ed.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2019) |
Abstract:
|
Studies have claimed that blind people’s spatial representations are different from sighted people, and blind people display superior auditory processing. Due to the nature of auditory and haptic information, it has been proposed that blind people have spatial representations that are more sequential than sighted people. Even the temporary loss of sight - such as through blindfolding - can affect spatial representations, but not much research has been done on this topic. We compared blindfolded and sighted people's linguistic spatial expressions and non-linguistic localization accuracy to test how blindfolding affects the representation of path in auditory motion events. We found that blindfolded people were as good as sighted people when localizing simple sounds, but they outperformed sighted people when localizing auditory motion events. Blindfolded people’s path related speech also included more sequential, and less holistic elements. Our results indicate that even temporary loss of sight influences spatial representations of auditory motion events.
|