|
|
DSpace at RU >
University Library >
Academic bibliography >
|
| Title: | How to develop web-based decision support interventions for patients: a process map |
| Author(s): | Elwyn, G. (231378548) Kreuwel, I. Durand, M.A. Sivell, S. Joseph-Williams, N. Evans, R. Edwards, A. |
| Publication year: | 2011 |
| Document type: | Article / Letter to editor |
| Journal: | Patient Education and Counseling |
| ISSN: | 0738-3991 |
| Volume: | vol. 82 |
| Issue: | iss. 2 |
| Start page: | p. 260 |
| End page: | p. 265 |
| Annotation: | Elwyn, Glyn Kreuwel, Ilse Durand, Marie Anne Sivell, Stephanie Joseph-Williams, Natalie Evans, Rhodri Edwards, Adrian Ireland Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Feb;82(2):260-5. Epub 2010 Jun 2. |
| Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: Significant advances have been made in the development of decision support interventions, also called decision aids, for patients facing difficult or uncertain decisions. However, challenges related to the definition, the theoretical underpinnings, the relative contribution of different components and how to migrate these tools to the Internet, remain unresolved. We propose a systematic process map for others to consider as they develop web-based, perhaps multimedia, decision support interventions and to examine the future challenges faced by developers. METHODS: Based on our experiences of developing and evaluating web-based decision support interventions, we outline a process map to illustrate the general principles of content specification followed by creative design and tailoring to the target audience. RESULTS: Content specification is fundamental and it should go beyond the traditional emphasis on scientific evidence in order to ensure patients' perspectives on the proposed options. The creative design phase aims to develop a medium to achieve three fundamental tasks: present information; achieve accurate affective forecasting; provide a basis for preference construction. This phase should be an open to experimentation and, where empirical work may be difficult or not yet available, guided by consultation with users, using an iterative method of trial and adaptation. CONCLUSION: There is little empirical research on how best to achieve these tasks. The guiding principle needs to be one of customising the delivery, based on close consultation with the target users and an iterative development process until the intervention is deemed accessible and useful. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The process map provides a basis for further developments and outlines areas where remaining challenges need further investigation. |
| Subject: | NCEBP 3: Implementation Science |
| Subject: | NCEBP 3: Implementation Science |
| Organization: | IQ Healthcare UMCN Extern |
| Appears in Collections: | Academic bibliography
|
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2066/95967
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|
|